Home Log In Sign Up FAQ's Contact ProBlogs About ProBlogs
 
Become a ProBlogger!
Be a part of the professional blogging community at ProBlogs.com!

 

Featured Bloggers
Creative(51,653) Creative
Robert Melaccio, sr(26,033) Robert Melaccio, sr
CatherineYen(18,480) CatherineYen
Mike Fak(17,931) Mike Fak
Danny Davids(13,047) Danny Davids
Alf Gordon(13,029)
Rob Trahan(12,257) Rob Trahan
beanerywriters(11,222)
CarolynCHolland(8,926) CarolynCHolland
BJChips(5,371) BJChips

 

Exxon Valdez still a Disaster two Decades later.


By Mike Fak(17,931) Mike Fak

Posted Tuesday, February 26, 2008
View All Blog Posts submitted by Mike Fak


There are children in college right now who have never heard of the Exxon Valdez and the eleven-million-gallon oil spill that destroyed Prince William Sound and the area’s Alaskan fish and wildlife almost two decades ago.

In one of the most glaring cases of the inefficiency of the American court system in history, the case of the people of Prince William Sound against Exxon is still in limbo.

The original verdict of $5 billion dollars that ruled against Exxon in 1994 has still not completed its process through the court’s appeal system. This week, the United States Supreme Court will hear arguments to either sustain the 14-year-old ruling of Exxon’s liability or send it back again into the maelstrom of court papers and motions and ineptness.

The people of the Sound state their ecology has never recovered from the massive spill and want not only closure but the punitive damages they were awarded 14 years ago. To highlight how ridiculous the system is, 6000 of the 33,000 residents at the time of the spill are deceased. One has to ponder if Exxon intends to delay and file motions until everyone is long gone and then the case can be thrown out for lack of claimants to testify. To date, each court in the process has taken on average four years to respond to the case presented before them. Has anyone in the judicial process ever heard of the phrase “fair and speedy" trial?

This law suit, which was originally defined as a litmus case for demanding corporate responsibility has instead shown that money and influence and power rule in this country more than the law does.

Exxon, who has no need to worry about public image since they are part of the oil monopoly in this country, state they have spent $3.5 billion on their own cleaning up the Sound. Residents welcome these executives to visit the area and see for themselves that the damages and repercussions from this disaster are still on the beaches and in the rocks. The fish and wildlife has yet to recover and experts believe it could be decades if ever for the Sound to go back to what it was like the fateful day a drunk drove a barge aground. There are also serious health questions being asked concerning the residents of the area, who have a much higher incidence of health problems than normal.

To show again just how subjected we are to corporate greed; the judgment amount brings it into focus. In 1994, the $5 billion judgment was based on the annual profit of Exxon. Now, just 14 years later, Exxon makes $5 billion in a single month.

One would think that Exxon could find it in their souls to just give up one month’s profit to try and heal a state and an ecological system but that isn’t to be. It has to be wondered how many millions have been spent on attorneys over the past twenty years to reverse a ruling that doesn’t sit well with corporate executives. I am willing to wager court costs have climbed easily into the tens of millions but it is better to win than to be responsible according to Exxon.

We continue to hear the classic politician spewing mantra, “We must remove ourselves from our dependency on foreign oil"

It is obvious in the case of Exxon, foreign oil interests aren’t the only group we need to divest ourselves from. We need to rid ourselves from the manipulation of our own oil producing corporations as well.

Calling them “our own" actually is a compliment Exxon doesn’t deserve.




This Blog Post has been read 236 times.
Posted to ProBlogs.com on Tuesday, February 26, 2008
View other posts by Mike Fak

Comments on this blog post:

Linde from Lincoln Il: (78 days 6 hours ago.)
I am so glad I found Mike Fak, having enjoyed reading his former column so much. I will be a faithful and grateful reader once again, it is so good to have someone who writes with such honesty and hit the nail on the head each time.


Leave a Public Comment or Question:



Virtual Border Fence a Virtual Failure
U.S. Immigration Deporting the wrong People.
Waiting Ten Years for Secure Borders is Ridiculous
Rebate Checks A Great Deal for Energy Companies and China.
The Vaccination Autism Link - What Every Parent Needs To Know
Spitzer’s Hubris shows no Boundaries.
School Violence Demands Responsibility
 
Most Recent Related Posts
The Media’s White Wash Of The Winter Solider Conference

"The Lull Before the Storm".

Chinese Heparin Bleeds America Like the Fed; Where is Ron Paul?

Online Auctions: Love Them or Loath Them?

Chi Mei Musuem in Taiwan, the collectable world renowned violins and others

Passion versus 2nd Ambition

New Migration of Immigrants in Northern Virginia.

Home alone - fending off robbers or working?

Building a PC for Dummies...Dummy

we havent talked for a year but i think she might like me

 

Most Popular Related Posts
How to tell if a girl likes you

A Tragic Screen Goddess--the forever Romy Schneider

Doctors Urge "Don't Stop Taking Anti-depressants"

A Great Motivational Video

A Tribute to Audrey Hepburn

There is no turning back.

The Media’s White Wash Of The Winter Solider Conference

"The Lull Before the Storm".

Just how do people justify voting for these candidates?

Chinese Heparin Bleeds America Like the Fed; Where is Ron Paul?

 
Home | FAQ's | Categories | Blogging Guidelines | Recent Referrals | Terms of Use | Privacy | About ProBlogs | Contact ProBlogs
Copyright 2008 ProBlogs.com - All rights reserved.
Not Logged In