Home Log In Sign Up FAQ's Contact ProBlogs About ProBlogs
 
Previous Posts
Rightful Discrimination: Why DNA Databasing by Government is Wrong

Perspective on Depression in the Teenage Wasteland

Hide Your Sons, Merck has them in the Crosshairs with Bullets of Gardasil

The Amazing Professor Duesberg Featured in Discover Magazine

Drug Company Payoffs Curtailed by One Dollar Fines (Actually, the Pharmaceutical Equivalent)

Chinese Heparin Bleeds America Like the Fed; Where is Ron Paul?

What a Good Doctor Does - Hats Off to Dr. Lorna Stuart

ADHD Options That Are Not Ritalin Nor Risk the Heart

Why the USDA Wants to Sterilize Fresh Produce and Turn Live Foods into Dead Foods

Questions Raised On Vytorin Meeting Documents - Created After The Fact?

Salt - The Next Diet Villian?

When State Medical Boards Attack, You Know You Want Some of What They're Going After

Neoconservative Chaos Over the Ron Paul Revolution

BREAKING NEWS! Promiscuous Mice Cured Of Sexually Transmitted Disease!!!!

"Horse Attacks Woman's Breast!" or HRT and the War on Cancer

All Posts by Robert Scott Bell
 



The Robert Scott Bell Show

By Robert Scott Bell(2,333) Robert Scott Bell
About Robert Scott Bell(2,333) Robert Scott Bell


Rightful Discrimination: Why DNA Databasing by Government is Wrong

Posted Tuesday, May 27, 2008 (6 days 7 hours ago.)

Headline: House sends anti-genetic discrimination bill to Bush "Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, was the only member of Congress to vote against the bill." Well, at least we know that it's unconstitutional...

Is there supposed to be a Federal role in genetic testing or databasing? I'm with Ron Paul. I know of NOWHERE in our nation's founding documents that it is found to be a proper and lawful role for the government to catalog us like animals.

There are obviously linguistic literary professionals hired to write, name and market these bills so they sound benign and helpful to us all. I mean, who would be "against" discrimination? Government-worshipers would like you to believe that this new legislation is necessary to protect you from insurance companies ready to turn your family down if they don't like your children's DNA sequence.

Actually, the thrust of this bill has nothing to do with genetic discrimination, but everything to do with removing another psychological barrier so that more Americans are willing to undergo the unnecessary and invasive testing. Are you the least bit reticent to turn over your DNA to an unelected bureaucratic oligarchy? They hope that you will be less so -- as long as you still believe that you will be eligible for medical insurance. Whether you can afford it or not is another question, because for certain, the government can't without stealing it from you or your neighbor first. Of course, they can always print the money until no one can afford anything without a wheel barrow full.

Genetic testing will start as being "voluntary." But, just like the Mothers Act, it will devolve into another federal mandate and soon you will not be able to fly without your genetic code embedded into your national I.D. Card. They will not stop until it's required, but don't worry because it's "for your own good."

But don't you want to know if you have "cancer" genes? Of course, they will never tell you that it's not your genes, it's their expression -- or much less that their expression depends upon what you believe and do. In other words, we all have genetic predispositions (or miasms) for disease, but genes change based upon our environment. Of course, that would mean that you are no longer a victim of your genes.

Not good for government or drug companies, but good for you.

Back to this genetic discrimination thing again. If you were an insurance company "writer" with responsibility to mitigate risk for the shareholders, and you found that someone had the gene for Sickle Cell Disease, would you insure them? You would be crazy to write them a policy. Of course, if a private company is free to determine who it insures, it will likely find a way to spread the negative potential and perhaps even write high risk policies. However, no insurance company would remain solvent if it could not discriminate for whom it issues a policy, however cruel.


Rather than being a boon to the uninsured, this genetic non-discrimination bill amounts to another government-mandated price increase for medical insurance across the board (for everyone). Inevitability, the illusion of "private" insurance will reveal itself to be an untenable web of regulations that ends whatever is left of the private insurance industry. Who will be able to afford it then?

Guess what. That's the plan. Hillary-care may be later than she thought, but she'll get it even if it's incremental and she's not the president. What's the end result? The feds complete their takeover of the medical insurance industry lock, stock and pill bottle.

Welcome to your universal single payer "insurance" disaster brought to you by Democrats AND Republicans. By government's intervention, there will be too few freedom lovers left who can actually afford insurance of any kind. Therefore, millions more will clamor for a medically-based Katrina style rescue. Clinton, Obama and McCain will happily oblige your medical enslavement.

It's both funny and tragic how BIG media and BIG government never acknowledge the fact that millions of the "tragically" uninsured are that way by choice. The "awakened" ones want little or nothing to do with government mandated medicine, much less the insurance that is there to pay for the bureaucrats interfering with the doctor-patient relationship.

Even if you are a fan of allopathic medicine, you do realize that government can NEVER deliver it to you in an efficient, fair and equitable manner, don't you? Here is where the economics of scale overwhelm even common sense. We do not have a crisis of health care because of a LACK of government bureaucracy. It has been many decades since there was a true free market in medicine and the healing arts.

We sit at the precipice of a diseased "universal" disaster simply because we have lost faith that freedom actually works better than central management and planning for three hundred million people. Genetic discrimination my as-pirin.

You are much more than your genetic code. No government will never get it (unless you turn it over to them). I just hope that we recognize our place in Creation before turning over what's left of our freedom to Aldous Huxley's and George Orwell's prophetic vision.

"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."

Why did Ron Paul vote against the "Genetic Anti-Discrimination" bill? Does Dr. Paul know something that the rest of Congress do not? Read The Revolution: A Manifesto and you will know the answer to that question and more. In the mean time, change you belief, change your genes.
 
Robert Scott Bell is a Homeopathic Practitioner and
nationally syndicated talk show host on Talk Radio Network.
To read more of his articles, listen to his podcast and more,
 
Click Here

        Comments (0)


Perspective on Depression in the Teenage Wasteland

Posted Tuesday, May 27, 2008 (6 days 7 hours ago.)

Headline: One in 12 U.S. teens report suffering from depression "Half of the 2.1 million teens noted in the survey as depressed said their condition had seriously interfered with their ability to cope and operate normally in their daily lives." When does depression not exist? When you know who you are and why you are here. This is exactly the struggle a teenager must undergo on the way to adulthood. In much of western culture, unfortunately, the rites of passage are watered down to mere traditional rituals devoid of any real impact on self-identity. What in life holds real value? Is it cheap plastic toys and video games from China, or is there deeper meaning to our existence on planet earth? I would hazard a guess that there are more depressed adults than teenagers, simply because adults have had a longer time to figure out that they do not know who they are or why they are here. So as more adults turn to SSRI medication, what are we to do with the children?

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration's Terry Cline said that "Appropriate mental health care can help their child recover and thrive."

What is appropriate? If there are any psychiatric conflicts of interest, you can be sure that "appropriate" equals drugs. Of course, the drugs take us further away from who we are and why we are here.

Sometimes looking at a problem from a different angle provides perspective that cannot be gotten in any other way. What is it that actually works against us determining our identity and reason for being? It's the Big "G" again. The more certain of who you are and why you are here, the less likely you are to depend upon government for anything. It is the necessity of every government to limit the consciousness of its citizens in order to grow unabated.

Therefore, if self awareness is your goal, perhaps declaring your independence from that which desires to keep you unaware needs some consideration. The same plethora of worthless choices available to us because of our over-emphasis on crass materialism are the same choices that allow for the greatest leaps in learning about ourselves and the reason we are here.

It's not difficult to recognize the value of life when you are born into an impoverished, dangerous land where your life can end at any moment. The real challenge is to recognize life's value when your only decision on a day to day basis is whether to play video games or head to the drive-thru for a snack. It's depressing to be a teenager (or an adult) with choices like that. No wonder they need to be drugged, they lack nutrition. Does that make any sense to you?
 
Robert Scott Bell is a Homeopathic Practitioner and
nationally syndicated talk show host on Talk Radio Network.
To read more of his articles, listen to his podcast and more,
 
Click Here

        Comments (0)


Hide Your Sons, Merck has them in the Crosshairs with Bullets of Gardasil

Posted Tuesday, May 27, 2008 (6 days 7 hours ago.)

Headline: Oral Cancer in Men Associated With HPVThe high risk of HPV-associated cancers in men suggests that vaccinating all adolescents is something that should strongly be considered,” said the lead researcher, Dr. Francis P. Worden...

 

I already warned you to hide your daughters. Now you must hide your sons as well. Last week it was women up to the age of 45, now they are going after young boys. Does the pharmaceutical industrial complex have any sense of decency?

This full-frontal assault on HPV is senseless, especially considering that there are so many natural ways to support immune function, much less eradicate a virus that anyone with minimal semblance of terrain integrity could clear with no pharmaceutical help at all.

The game is marketing and their weapon is your fear of the microbe. As long as you remain ignorant of the true laws of nature, it is a mere matter of Madison Street mathematics to keep you a customer of drugs and vaccines for questionable causation.

HPV does not cause cervical cancer. The lack of optimal immune function does. Have you looked into Uniform Picoscalar Oligodynamic Silver Hydrosol yet?
 
Robert Scott Bell is a Homeopathic Practitioner and
nationally syndicated talk show host on Talk Radio Network.
To read more of his articles, listen to his podcast and more,
 
Click Here

        Comments (0)



 

Archives:

June 2008
M T W T F S S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          
« May
   


Home | FAQ's | Categories | Blogging Guidelines | Recent Referrals | Terms of Use | Privacy | About ProBlogs | Contact ProBlogs
Copyright 2008 ProBlogs.com - All rights reserved.
Not Logged In